
Functional and Cognitive Neuropsyiology Laboratory
Sheth Lab
Our Work

Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders
A New Platform Based on Individualized Intracranial Recording and Stimulation The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders has encouraged many groups around the world to apply the DBS platform to treat severe and refractory psychiatric disorders. We are running an NIH BRAIN Initiative funded (UH3 NS103549) trial of DBS for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). This trial focuses on depression patients who have tried and failed conventional treatments, including anti-depressant medications, behavioral therapy, and electroconvulsive therapy. Sameer Sheth is the contact principle investigator and co-primary investigators are Wayne Goodman, M.D., professor and chair of psychiatry at Baylor College of Medicine, and Nader Pouratian, M.D., Ph.D., professor and chair of neurological surgery at UT Southwestern Medical Center Early open-label trials of DBS for TRD demonstrated promising results, but two large industry-sponsored pivotal trials were halted at interim analyses and were not able to substantiate efficacy. With this history as context, we planned our current trial with a different approach in mind. Patients with the same diagnosis of TRD may yet have very different constellations of symptoms, different “phenotypes.” We reason that these different phenotypes are manifestations of different brain network activity patterns across individuals. Thus, to optimize delivery of DBS therapy to a particular individual, we have to derive a detailed understand of his/her depression-relevant brain networks, such as those regulating mood, affect, anxiety, attention, cognition, etc. The better we understand these pathological networks within the individual, the better we will be able to engage them and restore balanced, healthy function. To this end, we borrow an approach common to epilepsy surgery, but not previously applied to most other neurological or psychiatric conditions. We employ semi-chronically implanted stereo-EEG (sEEG) electrodes to perform intracranial recordings and stimulation to understand network activity at the individual patient level. TRD patients in this trial are implanted with DBS electrodes targeting two previously studied targets, the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VCVS) and subgenual cingulate (SGC). We also temporarily implant sEEG electrodes in depression-relevant regions (prefrontal, mesial temporal, etc.) and keep the patient in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) for 1.5 weeks. During this time, we perform a number of recording and stimulation studies to understand the patient’s network activity and how it responds to stimulation. Patients then transition to the outpatient phase, during which we use the EMU-derived information to optimize programming of the DBS system. We expect that this trial will provide an unparalleled understanding of symptomatic networks in TRD and how they can be engaged and manipulated back to a healthy state with individualized DBS. More broadly, we hope that this approach of using the intracranial EEG platform can be applied to many other neurological and psychiatric disorders whose circuit-level dysfunction remains incompletely understood. For more information: View the clinical trials listing.
Neural Representations of Language
Human beings possess the remarkable ability to hear a series of instructions for the first time and implement them without practice and with a high degree of accuracy. How do our brains afford us this tremendous flexibility? This ability to ‘re-program’ ourselves has so far eluded artificial intelligence systems, and its underlying neural implementation in biological brains remains unknown. We aim to explore this question using a novel behavioral task, neurosurgical recordings of neural activity, and advanced neural network modeling. Patients are asked to perform a complex rule-following task where the rule changes dynamically from one trial to the next, and each rule contains more than one sub-rule that determines the mapping between incoming stimuli and participants’ responses. While patients perform this task, we record neural activity from medio-temporal and prefrontal regions putatively involved in higher-level reasoning and procedural learning. We are interested in whether individual neurons in these regions keep track of where we are in ‘cognitive’ space. We are also interested in whether some neurons represent rule structures more generally, independent of the specific stimuli that instantiate them. How do these individual neurons then form circuits that can dynamically interpret sensory stimuli in light of the ongoing rule, and dynamically reconfigure their activity to represent new information? How does the network switch back and forth between different sub-rules without interference? What neural signatures are associated with errors that would indicate a failure of this process? In collaboration with researchers at Google DeepMind, Columbia University, UCLA, University of Utah and Oxford University we hope to further understand this process by simulating it in silico using deep learning models. Recent artificial neural networks models of brain circuits have shed light on the circuit mechanisms underlying a myriad of perceptual and cognitive processes - all the way from basic processing in the retina to complex, context-dependent perceptual decision-making. Using the same models that have led to remarkable advances in AI - deep reinforcement learning models - we hope to better understand the brain mechanisms underlying this remarkable human ability.


Electrophysiology of Controlled Decision-Making
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) improves symptoms in ~66% of patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Conventional stimulation paradigms for OCD treatment are open-loop, continuous DBS (cDBS). Stimulation parameter adjustments require the patient to visit their psychiatrist in the clinic. Programming visits are burdensome and time intensive for both patients and clinicians. Our study aims (Grant: UH3NS100549) to develop closed-loop, adaptive DBS (aDBS), in which stimulation would be automatically titrated in response to specific symptom/side effect states. An aDBS system would decrease programming burden and increase efficacy of DBS for OCD. Neural biomarkers of OCD symptom severity and side effects of VC/VS must be identified in OCD to develop aDBS algorithms that improve on the traditional cDBS paradigm. The development of bidirectional DBS devices has equipped us to stream neural data chronically while delivering therapeutic stimulation. We collect these data in the clinic and at home in naturalistic settings. Integrating in-clinic and at-home data will inform our understanding of patient-specific pathology and allow us to investigate how OCD affects brain networks across patients.
Novel Targets for Neuromodulation
The field of neuromodulation is undergoing a rapid expansion. Experimental studies and clinical trials are underway for a variety of neurological and psychiatric diseases. We collaborate closely with clinicians and scientists in the Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Neuroscience, Engineering, and others to develop new targets and indications for neuromodulation. Parallel investigations across species models and scale (synapses, cells, networks, behavior) allow information to flow back-and-forth between the lab and clinic, facilitating the advancement of our understanding of the system and how to therapeutically modulate it.
